Did Hollywood Execs Finally Get the Memo That Women Can Carry Movies?
As a longtime critic and witness of movies, I have been waiting for a Summer of Women to happen, it seems, since before the Great Flood. While I tolerate that the surfacing of this season’s chick flicks will not clarify our healthfulness bond crisis, shrivel the gender prosecute cleft or fetch down the worth of oil, their good fortune should at least unequivocally prove to Hollywood’s moguls that women’s pictures are not D.O.A. And they should show the legions of craven executives with runty memories — foible presidents picture foremost salaries for greenlighting an everlasting array of cartoonish movies (read: facetious engage sequels) for the young boy in all of us — that stories of concern to women will charm us into movie theaters in noteworthy numbers.
Primarily, though, this box-office mademoiselle dominion should shut up studio heads find agreeable Jeff Robinov, who created a blizzard of crabby publicity for himself persist October when that unsparing industry chronicler, Nikki Finke, reported in an LA Weekly column that Robinov, then Warner Brothers’ president of production, “had made a recent enactment that his studio is no longer making movies with women throw as the water lead.” Immediately, Gloria Allred, the attorney and women’s rights warrior, weighed in on his remarks. “This is an outrage to all moviegoers and mainly women,” she harrumphed, then called for a refuse of Warner films. Robinov, who was then angling for boosting when he found himself labeled Hollywood’s man-who-women-loved-to-hate, backpedaled at the swiftness of light.
I feel reverence to site: read there
Tags: hollywood, movies, robinov, studio, warner, women
